Technologies and Promising Developments
of Graphite Production (Overview)

K. V. Simeiko1, S. V. Kupriianchuk1,2, A. O. Syniahovskyi1,3

1 Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, NAS of Ukraine, 12, Lysohirska st., Kyiv, 03028, Ukraine
2 Institute of Gas of the NAS of Ukraine, 39, Dehtiarivska st., Kyiv, 03113, Ukraine
3 National Aviation University, 1, Lyubomyra Huzara ave, Kyiv, 03058, Ukraine

DOI: doi.org/10.31717/2311-8253.23.1.2

Abstract

The article is devoted to a review of industrial technologies, promising developments, and research in obtaining graphite, particularly nuclear purity. Due to its unique properties, graphite has become an integral part of products used in nuclear energy, power equipment, mechanical engineering, metallurgy, and other industries. Graphite as a constructional and functional material is applied in high-temperature reactors: AVR (Germany), HTGR-1 (USA), improved gas-cooled reactor AGR (England), and in uranium-graphite high-power channeltype reactor (RBMK) (USSR, Russian Federation, Lithuania). At present time, graphite is a constructive and functional material in nuclear power systems of the IV generation, especially in high-temperature gascooled systems (HTGR, HTR, HTGR, VHTR) and liquid salt reactors (MSR). Due to the development of nuclear power systems of the IV generation and the increase in the popularity of electric transport, there is a dynamic increase in the consumption of graphite, therefore the issue of developing and improving technologies for the production of high-purity graphite (including nuclear) are of great practical importance. The aim of the article was to determine the most promising options for producing graphite, especially for using this material in generation IV nuclear power systems in future. Chemical industrial methods of cleaning natural graphite represent an environmental hazard due to the use of toxic precursors, which makes them prohibited in some countries. The main thermal industrial method of obtaining artificial graphite is the heating of coke or anthracite in special electric furnaces at a temperature of about 3000 °C and high pressure without air access. However, this method has several disadvantages, including high energy and resource costs. Among the considered developments and research in the direction of creating technologies for obtaining high-purity graphite, the biggest problem for thermal methods is the complexity of the hardware design and the low yield of the finished product, and for chemical methods (as well as industrial chemical methods) there is an environmental hazard due to the use of toxic substances. One of the promising possibilities is the high-temperature purification of graphite (including nuclear purity) in devices with an electrothermal fluidized bed. However, due to insufficient research in this direction, the technology has not yet gained industrial implementation. Considering the described factors, developing graphite purification technology in electrothermal fluidized bed reactors is an urgent scientific task.

Keywords: graphite, chemical and thermal production methods, electrothermal fluidized bed, IV generation nuclear power systems.

1. Toniolo B. (2016). European Carbon and Graphite Association (ECGA) Annual Report 2014–2015. Bruxelles, Belgium: EGGA, 19 p. Available at: http://www.ecga.net/sites/default/files/pdf/ecga_ar_2014-15_draft-final.pdf.

2. Jewell S., Kimball S. M. (2017). Mineral commodity summaries 2017. U. S. Geological Survey. Reston, U.S., 202 p. doi.org/10.3133/70180197.

3. Olson D. W. (2014). Graphite. In: U. S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook [Advance release]. U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey, 15 p. Available at:
https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/mineral-pubs/graphite/myb1-2014-graph.pdf.

4. Keeling J. (2017). Graphite: properties, uses and South Australian resources. MESA Journal, vol. 84 (3), pp. 28–41.

5. Siow K. S. (2017). Graphite exfoliation to commercialize graphene technology. Sains Malaysiana, vol. 46 (7), pp. 1047–1059. doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2017-4607-06.

6. Kalyoncu R. S. (2000). Graphite. In: U. S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook. Reston, US: U. S. Geological Survey, pp. 76–77.

7. Crossley P. (2000). Graphite: high-tech supply sharpens up. Industrial Minerals, vol. 398, pp. 31–47.

8. Vasilenko I. Ya., Osipov V. A., Rublevskiy V. P. (1992). Radioaktivnyy uglerod [Radioactive carbon]. Priroda, vol. 12, pp. 59–65. (in Rus.)

9. Vlasova K. P. (ed.) (1964). Grafit kak vysokotemperaturnyy material [Graphite as a high temperature material]. Moscow: Mir, 420 p. (in Rus.)

10. Zhmurikov Ye. I., Bubnenkov I. A., Dremov V. V., Samarin S. I., Pokrovskiy A. S., Kharkov D. V. (2013). Grafit v nauke i yadernoy tekhnike [Graphite in science and nuclear engineering]. Novosibirsk, 193 p. (in Rus.)

11. Dollezhal N. A., Yemelyanov I. Ya. (1980). Kanalnyi yadernyi energeticheskiy reaktor [Channel nuclear power reactor]. Moscow: Atomizdat, 208 p. (in Rus.)

12. Komir A. I., Odeychuk N. P., Nikolaenko A. A., Tkachenko V. I., Derevyanko V. A., Krivchenko O. V., Shepelev A. G. (2016). Grafit kak konstruktsionnyy material yadernikh eneregeticheskikh sistem IV pokoleniya [Graphite as a structural material for generation IV nuclear energy systems]. Voprosy atomnoy nauki i tekhniki [Problems of atomic science and technology], vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 51–55. (in Rus.)

13. Barsukov V. Z., Khomenko V. G., Senik I. V., Chernyy O. Sh. (2013). Litievye batarei dlya primeneniya na transporte: sovremennye problemy i perspektivy [Lithium batteries for transport applications: modern
problems and prospects]. Voprosy khimii i khimicheskoy tekhnologii [Issues of chemistry and chemical technology], vol. 4, pp. 127–131. (in Rus.)

14. Moradi B., Botte G. G. (2016). Recycling of graphite anodes for the next generation of lithium ion batteries. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 46 (2), pp. 123–148. doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0914-0.

15. Li J., Henry F., Feng Y. (2017). How to develop best carbon/graphite products for lead-carbon battery applications (Superior Graphite). Poster session presented at the 10th International conference on lead-acid batteries LABAT’2017 (Golden Sands, Bulgaria, June 13–16, 2017), p. 23.

16. Elementenergy. Cost and performance of EV batteries. In: Final report for The Committee on Climate Change, 2012, 91 p. Available at: https://www.element-energy.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/CCC-battery-cost_-Element-Energy-report_March2012_Finalbis.pdf.

17. Gurin I. V., Yakovitskaya T. S., Kaplenko O. G. (2011). Chistota grafitovykh i uglerodnykh kompozitsionnykh materialov [Purity of graphite and carbon composite materials]. Voprosy atomnoy nauki i tekhniki. Seriya: Fizika radiatsionnykh povrezhdeniy i radiatsionnoe materialovedenie [Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. Series: Physics of Radiation Damage and Radiation Material Science.], vol. 2(132/97), pp. 132–136. (in Rus.)

18. Fedorov S. S. (2018). Rozvytok naukovykh osnov stvorennia vysokotemperaturnykh ahrehativ z elektrotermichnym kypliachym sharom dlia ochyshсhennia vuhlecevykh materialiv [The development of the scientific foundations of the creation of high-temperature aggregates with an electrothermal boiling ball for the purification of carbonaceous materials] (PhD Thesis). Dnipro, 302 p. (in Ukr.)

19. Lee S., Kang D., Roh J. (2015). Bulk graphite: materials and manufacturing process. Carbon Letters, vol. 16 (3), pp. 135–146. doi.org/10.5714/cl.2015.16.3.135.

20. Tambanis S., Chiappini G. (2016). Thermal processing achieves up to 99.99994% purity of Mahenge graphite concentrates. Black Rock Mining Limited, 4 p.

21. Xie W., Wang Z., Kuang J., Xu H., Yi S., Deng Y., Cao T., Guo Z. (2016). Fixed carbon content and reaction mechanism of natural microcrystalline graphite purified by hydrochloric acid and sodium fluoride. International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 155, pp. 45–54. doi.org/10.1016/j. minpro.2016.08.002.

22. Bragina V. I., Baksheeva I. I. (2012). Razrabotka tekhnologii obogashcheniya grafitovykh rud [Development of technology for beneficiation of graphite ores]. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten (nauchnotekhnicheskiy zhurnal) [Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin], vol. 9, pp. 133–137. (in Rus.)

23. Belyaev S. V., Koroleva G. A., Lytkina S. I., Mamina L. I., Gilmanshina T. R. (2014). Perspektivnye sposoby podgotovki liteynykh grafitov [Promising methods for the preparation of foundry graphites]. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal’nogo universiteta. Inzhenerija i Tehnologii [Journal of the Siberian Federal University. Engineering and Technology], vol. 4 (7), pp. 462–466. (in Rus.)

24. Syarifuddin F., Florena F. F., Hanam E. S., Trisko N., Kustiyanto E. E., Arinton G. (2016). Effect of acid leaching on upgrading the graphite concentrate from West Kalimantan (Indonesia). AIP Conference Proceedings: 2nd Padjadjaran International Physics Symposium 2015, p. 1712. doi.org/10.1063/1.4941905.

25. Thi H. T., Hong N. D. (2017). Sulfuric acid leaching process for producing high purity graphite from 92.6% C to 98% C. World Journal of Research and Review, vol. 5 (1), pp. 23–26.

26. Peng W., Qiu Y., Zhang L., Guan J., Song S. (2017). Increasing the fine flaky graphite recovery in flotation via a combined multiple treatments technique of middlings. Minerals, vol. 7 (11), p. 208. doi.org/10.3390/min7110208.

27. Ding S. F., Niu Y. P. (2013). Research on purification technics of some flake graphite. Advanced Materials Research, vol. 119, pp. 753–755. doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.753-755.119.

28. Oliinyk M. O., Makachova A. I. (2014). Udoskonalennia tekhnolohii zbahachennia hrafitovoii syrovyny Zavallivskoho rodovyshcha [Improvement of the technology of enrichment of graphite raw materials of the Zavalliv deposit.]. Hirnychyi visnyk [Mining Herald], vol. 97, pp. 210–215. (in Ukr.)

29. Hayes T. (2016). Graphite for batteries (Edison Report). Edison Investment Research, 15 p.

30. Coosa Graphite Project, Coosa County, Alabama. Available at: https://www.mining-technology.com/projects/coosa-graphite-project-coosa-county-alabama.

31. Gubinskiy M. V., Fedorov S. S., Livitan N. V., Gogotsi A. G., Barsukov I. V., Rohathi U. (2013). Analysis of energy efficiency of furnaces for high temperature treatment of carbon materials. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, vol. 5 (2), pp. 71–76.

32. Zaghiba K., Songb X., Guerfia A., Riouxa R., Kinoshitab K. (2003). Purification process of natural graphite as anode for Li-ion batteries: chemical versus thermal. Journal of Power Sources, vol. 119/121, pp. 8–15. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00116-2.

33. Lakomskiy V. I. (2008). Elektricheskie i elektrokontaktnye svoystva elektrodnogo termoantratsita [Electrical and electrocontact properties of electrode thermoanthracite]. Kyiv: Academperiodyka, 105 p. (in Rus.)

34. Petrov B. F. (2006). Energosberezhenie pri proizvodstve elektrodnogo termoantratsita [Energy saving in the production of electrode thermoanthracite]. Kyiv: Ecotechnology, 144 p. (in Rus.)

35. Gasik M. M., Gasik M. I., Urazlina O. Yu., Kutuzov S. V. (2010). Modelling and optimisation of anthracite treatment in an electrocalcinator. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Ferroalloys Congress Sustainable Future (Helsinki, June 6–9, 2010), pp. 339–348.

36. Acheson E. G. (1895). Manufacture of graphite. Patent USA no. US568323A. C04B35/532. Application date: 27.12.1895. Publication date: 29.09.1896.

37. Ragan S., Marsh H. (1983). Science and technology of graphite manufacture. Journal of Materials Science, vol. 18 (11), pp. 3161–3176. doi.org/10.1007/bf00544139.

38. Foris S. N., Fedorov S. S., Gubinskiy M. V. (2008). Matematicheskoe modelirovanie shakhtnykh izvestkovoobzhigovykh pechey [Mathematical modeling of shaft lime kilns]. Systemni tekhnolohii [System technologies], vol. 2, pp. 98–104. (in Rus.)

39. Foris S. N., Fedorov S. S., Fedorov O. G. (2008). Issledovanie vliyaniya turbulentnoy diffuzii gaza na rabotu shakhtnykh izvestkovo-obzhigovykh pechey [Study of the effect of turbulent gas diffusion on the operation of shaft lime kilns]. Integhrovani tekhnolohii ta enerhozberezhennia: shchokvartalnyi naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal [Integrated technologies and energy saving: a quarterly scientific and practical journal], vol. 2, pp. 146–150. (in Rus.)

40. Fedorov S. S., Foris S. N., Kheyfets R. G., Gubinskiy M. V., Usenko A. Yu., Kovpak A. G., Agadzhanyan A. V. (2010). Issledovanie protsessov smeseobrazovaniya v shakhtnykh izvestkovo-obzhigovykh pechakh. [Investigation of mixture formation processes in shaft lime kilns]. Tekhnichna teplofizyka ta promyslova teploenerhetyka [Technical thermal physics and industrial thermal energy], vol. 2, pp. 184–197. (in Rus.)

41. Purification Furnaces. TevTech. Materials Processing Solutions: official website, 2013. Available at: http://www.tevtechllc.com/graphite-purification.jsp.

42. Syarifuddin F., Florena F. F., Hanam E. S., Trisko N., Kustiyanto E. E., Arinton G. (2016). Effect of acid leaching on upgrading the graphite concentrate from West Kalimantan (Indonesia). AIP Conference Proceedings (2nd Padjadjaran International Physics Symposium, 2015), 1712 p. doi.org/10.1063/1.4941905.

43. Ojovan M. I., Wickham A. J. (2016). Studying treatment of irradiated graphite. In: Nuclear Engineering International. Available at: www.neimagazine.com/features/featurestudying-treatment-of-irradiated-graphite-4818534.

44. Windes W., Burchell T., Bratton R. (2010). Graphite technology development plan. Idaho National Laboratory, 60 p. doi.org/10.2172/993160.

45. Virgilev Yu. S. (1988). Primesi v reaktornom grafite i ego rabotosposobnost [Impurities in reactor graphite and its performance]. Atomnaya energiya [Atomic Energy], vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 7–16. (in Rus.)

46. Neighbour G. B. (2007). Management of ageing in graphite reactor cores. Royal Society of Chemistry, 299 p. doi.org/10.1039/9781847557742.

47. Thi H. T., Hong N. D. (2017). Sulfuric acid leaching process for producing high purity graphite from 92.6% C to 98% C. World Journal of Research and Review, vol. 5 (1), pp. 23–26.

48. Oleynik T. A, Dzyuba O. Y., Kharytonov V. N., Kulakov Ye. V. (2008). Khimicheskoe obogashcheniye ghrafitsoderzhashchikh produktov [Chemical enrichment of graphite-containing products.]. Naukovi pratsi Donetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu [Scientific works of Donetsk National University], vol. 15 (131), pp. 139–151. (in Rus.)

49. Korobko D. I., Khomenko V. H., Barsukov V. Z. Makieieva I. S. (2015). Vplyv domishok ta metodolohiia yikh vyznachennia v hrafiti yak v aktyvnomu materiali litiiionnykh dzherel strumu [Influence of impurities and methodology of their determination in graphite as an active material of lithium-ion current sources.]. Visnyk Kyiivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu tekhnolohii ta dyzainu. Seriia: Tekhnichni nauky [Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Technology and Design. Series: Technical sciences], vol, 3, pp. 220–226. (in Ukr.)

50. IAEA (2001). Nuclear Graphite Waste Management. Proceedings of the Technical Committee meeting (Manchester, United Kingdom, October 18–20, 1999), 217 p.

51. Chang E. L., Poh H. L., Sofer Z., Pumera M. (2013). Purification of carbon nanotubes by high temperature chlorine gas treatment. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 15, p. 5615. doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50348h.

52. Lalancette J.-M. (1993). Process and apparatus for the purifications of graphite. Canadian Patent no. CA2163221. C01B32/215 (2017.01), C01B32/20 (2017.01), B01J 8/02 (2006.01). Aplicant and patent holder: STRATMIN INC. Application date: 21.05.1993. Publication date: 30.10. 2001.

53. Tsuji K. (2022). Global value chains: Graphite in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Working Paper ID-090. United States International Trade Commission, 91 p.

54. Matsumoto T., Hoshikawa T. (1994). Patent USA no. US5419889A. C01B32/215 Method for manufacturing high purity graphite material. Aplicant and patent holder: Toyo Tanso Co Ltd. Aplication date: 14.12.1994. Publication date: 30.05.1995.

55. Gupta C. K., Sathiyamoorthy D. (1999). Fluid bed technology in materials processing. New York: CRC Press LLC, 512 p.

56. Borodulya V. A. (1973). Vysokotemperaturnye protsessy v elektrotermicheskom kipyashchem sloe [High-temperature processes in electrothermal fluidized bed]. Minsk: Science and Technology, 1973, 176 p. (in Rus.)

57. Malinovskiy A. I., Rabinovich O. S., Borodulya V. A., Grebenkov A. Zh., Sidorovich A. M. (2012). Lokalnaya provodimost kipyashchego sloya, sostoyashchaya iz elektroprovodyashchikh chastits [Local conductivity of the fluidized bed, consisting of electrically conductive particles]. Inzhenerno-fizicheskij zhurnal [Engineering Physics Journal], vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 239–245. (in Rus.)

58. Kozhan A. P., Makhorin K. Ye., Gorislavets S. P. (1968). Elektrosoprotivlenie kipyashchego sloya grafitovykh chastits [Electrical resistance of a fluidized bed of graphite particles]. Inzhenerno-fizicheskiy zhurnal [Engineering Physics Journal]. № 15(4). — pp. 648–652. (in Rus.)

59. Markel R. F., Goldberger W. M. (1978). Method for heat treating carbonaceous material in a fluidized bed. US Patent no. US4160813A. C01B31/02; C01B31/04. Aplicant and patent holder: Graphite Synthesis Company. Aplication date: 21.07.1978. Publication date: 10.07.1979.

60. Akhmetov M. M. (2010). Poluchenie malosernistykh koksov iz sernistykh neftey [Obtaining low-sulfur coke from sour oils]. Ufa: JSC “INHP”, 180 p. (in Rus.)

61. Goldberger W. M., Carney P. R., Reed A. K. (1987). Thermal purification of natural mineral carbons. European Patent no. EP 0274165B1. C01 B31/04, B01J 8/24. Aplicant and patent holder: Graphite Synthesis Company. Aplication date: 05.01.1987. Publication date: 13.07.1988.

62. Zak M., Harrison W., Doninger J. (2003). Method and apparatus for heat treatment of particulates in an electrothermal fluidized bed furnace and resultant products. Patent USA no. US20050062205A1. C22B5/14. Aplicant and patent holder: Graphite Synthesis Company. Aplication date: 18.09.2003. Publication date: 24.03.2005.

63. Chudnovsky Ya., Kozlov A. (2013). Development and testing of the advanced CHP system utilizing the off-gas from the innovative green coke calcining process in fluidized bed. Report no. DE-EE0000434. Des Plaines, IL, US: Gas Technology Institute, 97 p. doi.org/10.2172/1123883.

64. Kozlov A., Chudnovsky Y., Khinkis M., Yuan H., Zak M. (2014). Advanced green petroleum coke calcination in an electrothermal fluidized bed reactor. Proceedings of the EPD Congress 2014, pp. 45–53.
doi.org/10.1002/9781118889664.ch6.

65. Fedorov S. S., Gubinskiy M. V., Foris S. N. (2014). Vybor razmerov rabochego prostranstva elektrotermicheskikh pechey kipyashchego sloya dlya pererabotki uglerodnykh materialov [Choice of dimensions of the working space of electrothermal fluidized bed furnaces for the processing of carbon materials]. Metallurgicheskaya i gornorudnaya promyshlennost [Metallurgical and mining industry], vol. 4, pp. 87–90. (in Rus.)

66. Fedorov S. S., Gubinskii M. V., Foris S. N. (2016). Mathematical simulation of the structural properties of packed and fluidized beds. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, vol. 89 (3), pp. 627–635.

Full Text (PDF)


Published
2023-09-07

If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Industrial Heat Engineering» the author must sign an agreement on transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Insert math as
Block
Inline
Additional settings
Formula color
Text color
#333333
Type math using LaTeX
Preview
\({}\)
Nothing to preview
Insert